We can all agree that the new Ghostbusters is a huge victory for gender equality in film. But does the movies stereotypical African-American character let it down?
They all let it down including the ape.
>>672682485
kirstine wig is good
How is this equaliy?
>All main actors are womyn
>the only black main character is a stereotypical dumbfuck nigger.
>>672681997
Its going to suck ass because it looks like it sucks already.
Lets do a remake of roots with all white people to make sure everyone is included. Whats more important, racial equality or historical accuracy?
>>672682628
the 1st movie was all men
the 2nd movie is all women
50/50
how are you this fucking stupid?
>>672681997
hahahah
gr8 b8 op, this is going to get responses
I'm not seeing this shitty movie though obvi.
>>672682757
Dustbusters is not going to work bro sorry
Is it the wig or the hat?
OP go post this shit on tumblr and reddit and fuck off.
No no post this on Tumblr hahaha
>>672682757
ghostbusters 2 was all men as well. kek
>>672682757
This is the third movie, retard.
>>672683372
>>672683436
well in that sense the men outweigh the women which means that they have to do a ghostbusters sequal to make it even.
>>672683016
Kill me
>>672682824
you blatently will you little fuckwad
This not equality this just stupidity if they only made them women just for the sake of pleasing the politically correct feminazi's because oh no we don't want to offend anyone etc then that's just stupid and it certainly doesn't look like they did it for entertainment sake. They aren't exactly funny. Infact they irritate me.
>>672681997
I dont like the fact that this isnt the same universe. Fucking reboots
>>672681997
Replace 'we' with 'feminists'
>>672684306
No no all of Tumblr agrees
>>672681997
If you don't like this movie, you're a sexist.
If you do like this movie, you're a racist.
Checkmate.
>>672682739
>Whats more important, racial equality or historical accuracy
Sadly I think you know where we're at today..
>>672681997
Am I the only person on all of /b/ who doesn't give two shits about the new Ghostbuster movie or the fact, that in general women appear more often in leading roles?
Like, everybody is up in arms about this, most even passionately angry.
Like why should I even care that a movie was made that is obviously not targeted at me specifically?
>>672684493
We enjoy a good feminazi bashing.
>>672681997
But it's not equality if they're replacing men with women.
Equality is picking the best people for the role, regardless of race or gender. These people were chosen specifically because they're women who fit the male character personas.
Basically, it's a copy, cut, paste, and slight edit of the original cast. Or at least, that's what they had HOPED it would be. In truth, they lack the same acting talent of the original cast. So this movie is destined to be a smug on the box office. People will remember the name and cringe.
"Hey, wanna see ghostbusters?"
"Sure, I love ghostbusters!"
"I mean the new one"
"Oh! Ew! Fuck you, dude!"
>>672684493
Because they (Hollywood) are taking something that was targeted to us, adding a female / racial twist, and trying to say "You must support this or you're sexist/racist."
Fuck that. They were taught this lesson with the latest Fantastic Four reboot, and they will learn it again with Ghostbusters. We're sick of fucking remakes, especially remakes with a twist.
They could be handing out free DVDs of Fantastic Four and the new Ghostbusters with blow jobs from supermodels and I would use the fucking discs as coasters.
Storyline follows the 80's cartoon. They even put the gorilla in.
>>672684816
If anything, it's the other way around.
The SWJ crowd calls this a victory, while people here on /b/ are crying like babies that their favourite movie franchise has been ruined.
>>672684848
Common sense , there is hope for humanity yet.
>>672684848
I meant smudge but I'm sure feminists are feeling rather smug about this film ever being made.
Quite frankly, it's an insult to equality but rather a tip of the fedora to the feminist oppressive agenda. Nice fucking going.
Yes it's a great victory for equality, 1 uneducated dumb black woman, and 3 insecure white idiots.
>>672681997
gender equality.
kek, if it was equal there would be two men in that group.
>>672685047
We'll see when it goes Fantastic Four / Gods of Egypt in the box office.
>>672682739
>historical accuracy?
bro its ghost busters
>>672683561
>every movie with men must be remade with women
>im a faggot
>>672685211
you know it will make loads of money. you can try denie it but thats a river in morroco
>>672684955
Yeah but would you also say no to the supermodel blowjobs
Me thinks not
>>672685145
There are two men in the group
>>672684955
>adding a female / racial twist, and trying to say "You must support this or you're sexist/racist."
There it fucking is again. Don't overdramatize this whole situation.
This isn't some secret jew ploy to push diversity. Just don't watch it and they'll learn their lesseon when they don't hit their numbers.
Don't make some giant crusade out of it. You only end up legitimizing the SJW movement.
>>672685344
>>672684955
He said he'd take the blowjob and use the disc as coasters.
If he has to watch the movies at the same time it gets a little trickier.
>>672681997
most lesbian movie ever
>>672685293
yes you are a faggot
REKT
>>672685344
I said I'd use the discs as coasters.
You never say no to the supermodel blowjobs.
>>672685047
>while people here on /b/ are crying like babies that their favourite movie franchise has been ruined.
Complaining about people complaining on /b/
I'm so meta it hurts your brain.
I'm still gonna see it. One, because it's still ghostbusters. And two, I'm a big fan of SNL so its gonna be a good watch Cause most of them are from it
>>672685508
thats why its hot.
This movie sounds lazy. If I wanted a genderbent ghostbusters team I would google for fanfiction cuz it's cheaper
>>672685611
I did not complain, I was describing the situation.
>>672685038
Haha
I for one am looking forward to all male remake of A League of Their Own.
>>672681997
How is that gender equality? The first movie was funny on it's own right, this seems to be patronising chick flick with badadam sandler humour. The women seem strereotypical tropes instead of characters. If they are not characters they are in their roles just because they have tits and that is pretty objectifying and sexist towards women.
I have nothing against a new Ghostbusters movie nor all female casts but I am against bad movies and ruining existing franchises with bad sequels.
>>672685038
Fucking lol'd inappropriately in the doctors waiting room.
>>672685467
Oh please. Anyone who didn't get behind Fantastic Four was labelled a racist right up until it came out and people saw for themselves how much it sucked. That's one of their marketing tools to trick people into seeing shitty remakes.
My objection to this movie is that it is a lazy remake with a gender flip, instead of a continuation. However, if you don't think that Hollywood and the SWJs aren't going to be playing the sexist card every chance they get on people who don't line up to see this, then you're hopelessly clueless.
The simple fact that they've been trumpeting that this would be a complete reboot, yet tried to make the trailer seem like it was going to be a sequel should let you know how bad this is going to suck.
>>672685467
>Don't make some giant crusade out of it. You only end up legitimizing the SJW movement.
This so much.
>>672683016
hueheuheuehueheuheue
>>672681997
I disagree. I think it's just mad feminazis who wanted their own special girl version.
It's going to be a shitty movie obviously
>>672685671
>I'm a big fan of SNL
Nice try comrade.
>>672685467
It doesn't have to be a some conspiracy theory to be annoying. There are many good movies with diversity and they should make more. But doing it this bluntly and using it as the marketing point is just ugly and patroncing. Why not to just make good movies instead of making this calculated marketing shit and saying everyone must like them or they are sexists and should be hanged on the big oak tree and what ever. This blatant forcing of shit and questioning of peoples intelligence is what makes people against SWJ movement
>>672683561
the next movie will be a trap, a hardcore faggot, a feminist and a cuck.
they'll call it Aidsbusters
>>672682757
Well played, sir.
>>672681997
>I know what this movie needs! a strong, independent, beautiful at every size womyn of color who don't need no man!
>OH LAWDY JEEBUS THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU OOGA BOOGA
>>672681997
Huge victory? Because it's the first movie ever with all-female headliners?
>>672685467
>>672686555
>if we just close our eyes and ignore it will go away
>>672685125
im so glad thunderf00t did a video on it
What I'm wondering is why did they choose ghostbusters? I'm sure there's plenty of other movies that had an all male cast, did they just choose it because of how popular it was?
>>672685325
Shut up you faggot
>>672681997
I think we can all agree that it's going to be a really, really shitty movie
>>672687229
I'd watch all female reboot of something like this
>>672687444
Amen nice trips
>>672681997
>huge victory for gender equality
Eat dicks
Chick movies have been around forever
Trailer sucks, movie's gonna suck, they ruined a great franchise. If you don't buy into some bullshit Hollywood is doing then just don't see the movie. Complain all you want, if you see the movie they still make money.
>>672687222
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNxz9xbSzY
Think all the doubters in this thread should watch this.
>>672687207
>if we act like a bunch of retards who only make the other side look better, it will go away
lena dunham to write, star and direct the next ghostbusters
>>672681997
That one on the left, gender is mayonnaise, and why do you keep calling the black dude a woman.
>>672687787
>i dont know how to greentext. go away
>>672687831
>>672683847
I don't think you really understand what the word blatantly means... hell you don't even know how to spell it.
>>672681997
>African-American caricature
FTFY
It's not pain compelling you. It's Patty!
>>672688986
i dont think you know what blatently means or how to speel it either
>>672688988
Power of the fucking ape man.
>>672681997
Was gender equality not supposed to mean indifference of what genders picked for the movie?
Like, how the fuck is going in the completely opposite direction of the original making the genders equal?
Femminazis say they want equality, but this just proves that gender matters. It doesn't destroy patriarchy, it validates inequality. Equality will not be achieved when all fucking actors have vaginas, mudslime skin or chinked eyes, it will be achieved when no one gives a flying fuck.
>>672682757
The first 2 movies weren't made specifically for a male cast, they weren't making any statements about gender they were just trying to entertain.
>>672689528
Exactly how all movies should be made.
>>672689403
Also women are just generally unfunny
>>672681997
If genders were ever to be equal, genderflipping the cast of an old movie wouldn't justify a remake.
>>672683016
fucking gold.
>>672689528
that statement reeks of patriarchy
>>672689858
yes, because women are completely equal to men but way nicer to look at.
If only this picture accurately represented the movie. I could do with four chicks on a space colony fighting off aliens sans vagina jokes.
>>672682739
this was the basis of a sketch on W/ Bob and David.
>>672689994
I've heard the term patriarchy a lot obviously but I just decided to look it up and oh boy are feminists using it as wrong as the use the word privilege. Not exactly wrong, but wrong enough to not fit the traditional meaning.
I hope the blonde dyke and the other skinny scientist lady end up having a 30 minute strap-on scene. That would be really empowering to see them fucking for like a third of the running time. Really empowering.
>>672682757
Their secretary was a woman, duh
>>672690724
patriarchy is a system of oppression that disadvantages women and men who dont fit the male stereotype.
>>672691089
agreed.
>>672691270
And the children, don't forget the children.
>>672685038
kek
>>672691270
Even thought this is a bait post, how is it even remotely true when most people who rule the world don't fit into a typical male stereotype...
>marketing will switch to feminism crowd
>we will now know the true power of feminist if they can salvage this crap
boycott this shit
Three bitches all trying to be bill murray and a random silverback gorilla from the jungle
>>672681997
Gr8 b8 m8
>>672691560
they are still trying to sell the image that they are.
I don't care for this movie, dosnt look funny and the originals where meh
>gender equality in film
>Main protagonists 100% femal
>0:1 ratio = equal
>>672681997
<--- explained
>>672681997
I fail to see how every character being female is equality. I mean, if anything, this is the exact thing that feminism is claiming to be against, just in the opposite direction. If it was about equality there would be a man in there. Its about female superiority. Its about enslaving men. Its about hamplanets not wanting to exercise.
>>672691560
It's not about ruling the world it's about the traditional family dynamic where the father is the head of the house hold and the one with a job. It was not a systematic oppression of women.
Like I said before it's interpreted and so doesn't fit it's original meaning. Consequently no knows what the fuck anyone else is talking about anymore.
>>672692100
was having an all male cast enslaving to women?
>>672692064
>comedic talent
>>672692304
Apparently so, since we now have the feminist movement. Even though I wouldn't think so, and anyone with a brain in their head wouldn't either.
>>672684493
>Like
>>672692064
Third one in... Along for the paycheque.
>>672692249
but it is oppressing to women to be expected to be nothing more than a housewife and nanny, and its oppressing for men to be expected to provide for a whole family on his own. everyone should be able to do whatever the fuck they want without having to bow down to stupid gender roles.
>>672692349
Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon are pretty funny.
You've seen them on SNL or?
>>672692560
No, I saw them in the fuckin' trailer.
>>672692473
if you dont think so then why should having an all female cast be enslaving to men? its just a fun take of the story and if you dont think you're gonna like it because you hate women and dont see them as people then just fucking dont watch the movie you little shit.
>>672691100
This movies will be a Hipster Twink Fuccboi
Niggers
>>672692693
Watch some SNL skits with them on youtube or something.
They are pretty funny.
The fatty and nigress though, aren't. At all.
>>672692739
>>672683561
>the men outweigh the women
ha, clearly not, the bitches team has a fatty and a huge ape, they're going to be a lot heavier than the male cast
>>672692824
jesus fukkin chirstin duns
>>672692556
That's not expected anymore. That's the point I guess I'm making, it's out of date and that's why it's modern use doesn't really make sense anymore and makes things sound worse than they are.
>>672685739
You're a fucking retard
>>672692700
Okay let me break it down for you.
4 men in a movie! OPRESSIONSSSS!!!! START MOVEMENT TO END OPRESSIONSSSSSSS
VICTORY! NOW THERE ARE 4 FEMALES IN THE MOVIE!!!!!! NO MORE OPRESSSIONSSSSSSS (for women)
>>672682757
the first two movies are all men this one is a all women.
how are you this fucking stupid?
Just finding out about this
>>672687500
Don't ruin my Warriors
>>672692739
evolution is a jewish fairy tale you cuck
>>672693260
you're literally retarded
>>672693169
well gender roles still exist, women are seen as sex objects, as inferior to men and men are expected to be providers in some sense, to be rich/strong and have no emotions and that is what feminists etc are critizising when they are talking about "patriarchy". its fucked up outdated gender roles.
It's okay fellas bill Murray will do something about it.
>be me
>regularly be on 4chan since 2003
>somehow marry a tumblr whore
>even she knows this looks like total garbage
anyone who says otherwise is simply in denial.
>>672694262
Maybe it's an american thing. Definetly doesn't line up with my experiences.
THIS TRIGGERS MY GAY RIGHTS FUCK OFF
>>672694297
imagine this:
>Bill Murray appears as a ghost at some point, he looks straight at the camera and says "i'm sorry" before getting zapped in the ass by the fatty and never being seen again
>>672694262
>and that is what feminists etc are critizising
nope.
you have a rather skewed perspective of the sexism inherent in feminism.
>>672694747
>>672681997
>>672685611
>>672691270
same here most of my buddies are stay at home dad's who play video games and dirt bike all day..
Then the bbq or cook a damn fine dinner
>>672694747
its always easy to close your eyes towards injustice if you dont feel like you are affected. where are you from? can women walk around naked without being harrassed? can men show weakness without being ridiculed?
It's okay. Bill Murray is the worst actor in the world.
>>672681997
I might have checked this out if Melissa McCarthy wasn't involved. I can't stand that cunt.
>she plays the same character in every movie
>her acting sucks
>she's as unfunny as Amy Schemur
>can't stand her voice.
She is the sole reason I'm avoiding this mid-budget turd.
>>672694964
Then all the feminazi gorilla's in the theater start a riot and it'l be like a real life planet of the apes. Popcorn and short hair everywhere.
>>672681997
This is going to be the best movie of 2016. The all female cast shows that we are making progress towards are more equal and representative image in the world. Women deserve to be on the big screen just as much as you boys do. Stop complaining about it because you are just jealous. Mellisa is one of the best actors of our generation and you little boys will just have to suck it up. The fact is she is a better actor then the men who applied for the role and she got it fair and square. Now fuck off youshit lords
What annoys me more than all the SJW bullshit that's surrounding this movie, is that I've already seen it.
It was called Ghostbusters and it was released in 1984.
Why can't mainstream Hollywood come up with an original idea lately? I mean fuck, they're even going to reboot Spiderman, which has already been rebooted once already.
Pretty much every movie release recently it seems is a reboot, remake, or part of a trilogy or "expanded universe"... and it's getting fucking boring.
>>672696190
Go back to the dark depths of hell in Tumblr where you came from.
>>672695834
i love her, she's my babe, i'm gonna watch every movie she's in *-*
also its probably not her fault that she gets cast for the same role over and over, thats probably the roles she gets offered..
>>672696190
Oh hi there Marketeer of Sony Incontinent. Doing some itty bitty damage control?
>>672696369
they are running out of ideas. or are too cheap to come up with new ideas. hollywood is a capitalist machinery that doesnt care about making good content, they only care about making profit.
>>672696389
The Set Grip is a guy. He managed to sneak in, well done. 2nd row from bottom 5th from left.
I'm not religious but if we hold a cross up and point it at feminazi's will it burn them like light burns a vampire ?
>>672696389
>thank god no electricians
>only grip looks like a bulldyke
Career choice validated
672696369
Fucking THIS!!! Ever4y time I hear of another remake a part of my inner child dies, and they'll never remake any of the older movies that would really benefit from a reboot.
I don't care about diversity. Just make a good movie.
This looks like shit.
Personally I don't think they could have made this with men either. Everything they try to remake sucks ass, with few exceptions.
They should have stuck with making a third movie, and not rebooting.
>>672696711
bet he killed himself by now
>>672697388
Except Dredd. Even though they could have dropped out a Lincoln Log and it would have been better than the original
>>672694235
Lol, yep resort to baseless namecalling that you cant even back up. typical woman. You've made up my mind, i'm going to treat women like shit from now on because you are in fact shit.
>>672696389
Ah, if i wasn't going to see it before, i am definitely not going to see it now. Just because it is unfair when it is only men does not make it fair when it is only women. This is just an inequal as anything any man has ever done.
>>672697719
but dredd wasn't a remake, just an adaptation of another judge dredd comic/story ?
>>672697719
Dredd was actually pretty good; makes the first movie look like a parody.
>>672687820
Sad thing is I'd fuck her.
>>672698082
yeah it was okay, watchable at least, unlike this crap.
>>672696375
.....or, it's the only role she is capable of playing, period.
Also:
>>672696190
>Mellisa is one of the best actors of our generation
fuckin' HAH.
If she is what is being touted as 'one of the best', then you young fucks have MUCH lower standards than you realized.
>can't act? that's ok, just be fat, black, awkward. Be all 3 for extra Oscar nominations!
>>672698203
nah, a lot of good actors have been stuck with the same boring role for years.
>>672681997
The sad thing about stuff like this is that when men have something really bad like being enslaved or oppressed our reaction is to try to make sure no one has to experience that.
When a woman is oppressed it is their goal to make sure that anyone who hasn't already been oppressed becomes oppressed and that the formerly oppressed become the oppressors.
Women really do just belong in the kitchen. Can't grasp simple concepts except when it suits them. Example? this movie.
>>672698685
And people have panned them for it.
>>672698852
bullshit
this movie doesnt oppress you you retard
Best thing about 80s?
No one cared about these sjw shit.
>>672698685
johnny depp has the same role every movie even if they look different.
>>672698852
Blows my mind. I'm not even against a movie with an all woman cast, but it's pretty amazing that this is being sold as a triumph for women, when the only reason the film exists is because of the men who made the original iconic.
>>672699181
No, but it takes a big steaming shit on a beloved piece of cinema, and the media coverage equates aping the good work of the past to actually producing something novel and creative.
Meanwhile, an actual good woman filmmaker like Kelly Reichardt labors in relative obscurity...
>>672699506
>Meanwhile, an actual good woman filmmaker
back to tumblr, libcuck
>>672699506
yeah, i don't really care that they are all women either, it just shows you what women think equality is, women first, men second and most of the time not at all.
kill yourself?
>>672696538
Oh, I get it, it's "oh hi Mark"...eteer. Well memed, self.
>>672681997
It's not a good movie. Yeah, you made a movie with an all female ensemble cast, good for you. It's still not a good movie. It's not funny. It's not entertaining. It feels forced, because it is.
But saying anything negative about it is automatically sexist, because furthering an agenda is more important than being entertained.
>>672690358
wisdom
>>672699719
kek, butthurt little bitch. getting this offended over your gender not being included in a fucking hollywood movie... imagine what it feels like to watch hollywood movies as a woman or black person then. fucking retard.
dude who the fuck cares, its a movie. get this shit off of here
>>672700319
if the movie is good, I'm sure the feeling is referred to as "being entertained"
Something I think feminists have a hard time doing, I think, unless it's at the expense of someone else's misfortune.
>>672682628
stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason, go to the ghetto and they'll nig out
OI WHITE BOI
>>672700720
>>672700319
What the fuck are you talking about? So you've never seen a woman or black person in a movie?
>>672701633
Was kinda hoping for a response from that idiot, but i do like that picture
>>672681997
>>672694769
>>672681997
>>672700926
>>672701429
>>672701633
I have a thing for nipple piercings,got my own aswell,great for sex.
>>672702373
no one cares about you and your bf, homo
>>672695140
>>672702599
>>672701472
often they are shows as caricatures or stereotypes or not represented at all. most hollywood movies have an entirely white cast and hollywood movies aimed at a male audience usually dont have female characters with depth, only hot babes that are functioning as sex objects with no real personality.
>>672702806
>>672681997
It will only be a victory when it does good in the box office. But it will tank because it
>Alienates the old fans by clearly having none of the charm of the first
>Will not attract new fans because it looks like every "X attracts Y because Z and now it is up to a group off goofballs to stop it!" film ever.
They put all their effort into screaming "girl power" that when it came time to say something meaningful they passed out on the floor. And in the end their will be so many entitled cunts crying "patriarchy" when it fails.
>>672685288
>I dont think that you think historical means what it actually means
>>672702599
Calm down,it will only hurt the first minute after that your bunghole gets used to it.Dont tell me your a little bit curious.
>>672702806
>often they are shown as caricatures or stereotypes
Don't act like people don't embrace those stereotypes of their own volition, you disingenuous twat.
Let's see, a stereotyipical nerd girl, a stereotypical butch lesbian one, an under employed black sassy female security guard.... Nope. This is a massive set back. It's like calling woody Allen a huge step forward for Jews. It's enough to make people who fought for equality and the use of free speech to push equality such as Lenny Bruce throw up in their graves.
>>672702940
>>672681997
At least Ghostbusters was censored thanks to Murray and his "get that sailor something to fuck" comment. What does the new installment has to offer? None of that? Oh well...
It's going to be dissapointing
>>672703483
Wow, it actually took that long for some anon to post this? I'm disappointed in you /b/, I really am.
Obvious fail movie with < B rate comedians
>>great victory
Implicit racism
>>op is a faggot
>>672703666
trips is the number of the beast
>>672682628
This is the libtard version of equality.
>>672681997
I'm seeing it coming. If this fails, the blame won't be upon the film itself, but upon the society.
i really wanna see this movie now ;_;
>>672681997
Implying a movie is huge step forward in society, fuck off
>>672703889
>>672703977
cuck detected
>>672703831
No. It's an attempt by Hollywood to get an audience they don't understand excited. Actual liberals just want the best person for a role to get the role and aren't amused by the unironic lesbian and black stereotypes displayed by this movie. It reminds us of when black actors had to perform in black face. Literally make themselves darker and say things like oh lordy.
>>672692942
Kek
>>672704316
yeah, they should have gotten black and female screenwriters as well instead of just actors :( lame ass hollywood white boys.
>>672683561
>>672704316
check your definitions libtard
>>672696389
'Equality'
I hope this tanks so fucking hard so they cry about sexism, not realising maybe they just aren't as good at their jobs as men in the same field.
The best at pretty much everything in the world is always a man.
>>672695140
I'm a Jew, and my sister is a Jew who runs a newspaper and freelancers for prestigious magazines. I think you're off the mark. Men and woman are sexual and sexualized by the media. Ryan Gosling wouldn't get roles if he didn't look amazing.
Now racial minorities outside of white Jews , those people can't get roles. Even in movies about ancient Egypt. You couldn't get a Sephardic Jew to play Moses? Seriously?
>>672704574
>>672703791
Yeah, I'm good. Thanks for pointing it out, I'd missed it if it weren't for you, anon.
>>672700319
that is precisely my point, they fail to learn how it feels to watch this happen to themselves, and then they go on to do it to others. fuck off and die cunt
>>672704868
No, because Jews (Especially kike men) just aren't as attractive as Whites. Sure, go ahead and post the few examples of the best jews versus the worst whites if it helps you sleep, but on average whites are considered the most attractive race.
>>672704999
>>672704697
Check your history. They put black face on black faces.
https://youtu.be/ZjTB4ON9omw.
>>672686964
mfw Aidsbusters
well played sir
>>672696389
all this shows that it's not about rebooting/restarting the series, it's only about "fuck you straight white man".
Who you guys try to convince? We all know we are going to see it as soon the torrent is available...
>>672705147
check your style, they use grey pixels on brown backgrounds
>>672687075
Oc from a Facebook repost
>>672696389
how about this all female group make an original movie instead of just riding the coat-tales of another movie that has already been released?
have women absolutely no identity or originality of their own? I guess women don't really have personalities or interests, they just mirror what an influential man in their life was like (father, brother, teacher, boss, last guy who fucked her, etc.). They're like Silly Putty--it doesn't create anything, it just copies whatever it's pushed up against.
>>672705328
They put show polish on the one black guys face along with enlarging the appearance of his lips, giving him white gloves and a big top hat. Then they had him say a bunch of stereotypical lines that a white man in black face would say and sing a little diddy. This wasn't a style choice. It was racism. Same actor then couldn't spend.his money in town because no negros allowed signs were everywhere.
>>672705750
THE FIENDS
>>672705631
she's right you know..
>>672705189
is that cesaro KING OF SWING
>>672706175
help me /b/rothers
>>672706167
no she left,wing
>>672699605
>you have to hate all women to not be a cuck
That just makes you a fag, faggot. I just want women to complement men instead of trying to be men.
And FWIW Reichardt doesn't submit her films to "women's film festivals" or bank on grrrl power fee-fees because she just wants her films to be regarded on their own merit, and she's pretty much an outsider to Hollywood kikery.
>>672705709
Women with actual creativity are very rare. I think most of us experience this in the workplace. Talented women might apply well understood strategies very adroitly, but they rarely synthesize novel solutions from a broad base of knowledge and experience, and from what I know, they're more inclined to use a shorthand of memes and canned thoughts instead of reasoning from fundamentals. When presented with unusual situations, they freeze up and
>>672706246
>>672706255
left wing is right
>>672705329
There isn't a doubt in my mind that this movie will be embarrassingly bad.
>>672706350
>When presented with unusual situations, they freeze up and
forget to fully copy and paste their answer to someone on a thread?
>>672706108
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Robinson
Actually the treatment was really bad. Also ironic.
>>672681997
The whole thing is gonna be a copy paste of something better. Plus skits are cute when they 5 min long but 2 hours gonna get old quick.
>>672706493
but how can she go right while traveling left?
>>672705631
She's so right. Plus I've friend zoned girls before, so while the friend zone exists it's not sexist against men. There are some people who want to hang you that you'd rather just be friends.with, because they ugly.
>>672681997
They should have called it Scary movie:ghost busters edition.
>>672706543
THE HORROR
>>672706350
this is bullshit, its that women generally get underestimated and not taken seriously even when they are right. their accomplishmnts are often overlooked because of sexist prejudice.
>>672706493
She made three turns.
>>672706920
>>672706809
Bang. Auto correct.
>>672706167
Not really.
She, and many like her, has the concept of "friend" mixed up with "acquaintance".
Friends get to know each other, see each other frequently, and through the passing of time with a dear friend, strong feelings develop over time.
When it becomes apparent that her concept of a friend is nothing more than "he's ok, he buys me lunch and stuff", it's clear she likes the attention and gift giving, but has made no actual attempt connection with the man in question, demoting him to "acquaintance with benefits".
Once a guy figures this out and opts out, girls freak out and go "what, are we not 'friends' anymore? you asshole, you just wanted me for sex.'
Funny, that.
>>672681997
it's a rare thing when a remake is as good as or better than the classic. this film has that working against it right out of the gate.
why is this even being made? i'd find it hard to believe there was some massive outcry from fans who demanded it happen.
>>672707046
but to go three turns she would have skipped over two other kids turns, thus earning her a timeout
>>672707168
no, women are smarter than men, but men are too stupid to understand them and therefore think they are dumb when they are actually the dumb ones!
>>672707505
>>672706837
You'd care if you were of a darker complexion. We still had racially segregated housing in my area in the 80's. You could play for.the chief's, but not get a house by the plaza. So we sent my white mom in to do all the paperwork. Suck it "white" people.
>>672707321
yeah stupid girls for thinking a guy who seems to like spending time with her likes to spend time with her.
>>672682739
>Ghostbusters
>historical accuracy
>>672706920
"accomplishments" lol, you get overlooked because your accomplishments aren't very accomplished compared to male counterparts. Its the same reason why men make more money, its not some scheme, men go to school longer, work longer hours, and have more dangerous jobs. we get paid more because if we didn't do these jobs, noone would because most women do not have the same drive that a man does and infact are not suited to a competitive environment. your post in this thread is a great example, you cite no evidence, and dont even have an arguement as to why you think women are overlooked, you just state that they are. then, I, a male, come along and provide all of these things and completely debunk your post, which is why women get overlooked, you put in way less effort just as a general rule.
>>672707452
Nah, she just cut through the the bike lane, and ran them.over.
>>672692811
Nah, the fat one and the black one CAN be funny. The writers that made this garbage are idiots, so the four of them are boned.
>>672706539
No, just trailed off. Can't remember how I wanted to finish it.
>>672706920
Might be b8 but there are smart women who get unfairly lumped in with the muh soggy knees crowd. I work with a few. They are either too old to coast on their looks, or a bit mental in other ways.
And there's nothing wrong per se with women's strategy, I just don't like it when it's equated with the more masculine talent for novel invention (for example, genderswapping a remake of a classic film and pretending it's an accomplishment on level with the original). And there are plenty of men who by nature or habit need to be spoonfed solutions and pretty much just follow the leader... compare any hollywood exec of today with David Selznick, for example.
The trailer showed that they had no original ideas.
They just fucking stole from the first movie and that one scene from The Exorcist.
>>672707505
no, women are more egostistical than men, meaning they will go out their way to outprove and outdo while a man will stick to a solution that works until something better comes along. case'n'point, look at gender ratio of therapists and engineers
>>672707895
women actually are more successful in school and are more likely to pursue a higher education than men, but once they enter the businessworld, their success drops rapidly, not because they arent capable, but because of the sexist system we live in.
>>672707382
this.
>>672681997
nigger woman dindu nuffin
>>672708646
show me evidence cunt. show me one shred of evidence. you can't.
>>672707735
While you're not wrong in implying that men and women can 'just hang out', when a man makes his intentions clear
>hey I bought you that dress you like
>hey let's go have a nice dinner, just you and I
>hey let's go to the movies, just you and I
>hey I brought you flowers
and she's oblivious to how interested he really is
>you're such a good friend! thank you! ...(seriously, what guy friend just randomly buys flowers for a girl he isn't highly interested in?)
for most men, this line
>you're such a good friend!
is the polite way for a girl to say
>I'm not interested!
and yet, for some reason, women freak out when the guy pulls away.
>>672708336
nope, evolutionarry women have a tendency to be social and group thinkers, whereas males are trying to be the "alphamale", therefore being egoistic, greedy and inconsiderate. might also be the main reason why males are more successful, they are basically sociopaths.
>>672707721
well im fortunate my complexion changes with how sunny it is
but if your still mad about being black, a solution has been found: http://www.snopes.com/russian-laboratory-black-skin/
>>672708905
Because we all know that group thinking is great and never steers anyone wrong. just look at the flat earth theory.
>>672681997
>We can all agree that the new Ghostbusters is a huge victory for gender equality in film.
We really can't. It's ham-fisted and cringey as fuck.
>But does the movies stereotypical African-American character let it down?
Yeah. It's racist as shit and irritating.
>>672708783
http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/women-higher-education.aspx
http://www.nber.org/digest/jan07/w12139.html
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/10/31/women-more-likely-to-graduate-college-but-still-earn-less-than-men
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/women-more-educated-men-still-paid-less-men
>>672708646
A real human being wouldn't want the rest of the world conforming to their own sensibilities and being "careful not to offend them", rather roll with the punches and rise above the swarm.
Maybe your idiot ass only has that "forward" thinking keeping you from an early grave enduced by Nature and Darwinism so that way you don't end up blowing your brains out all over the keyboard because you figure no one gives a shit about you and you're too goddamn lazy, incompetent, or nonchalant about getting up and changing your life.
>>672707941
She was a bad influence on those children then and deserved to run themover
>>672709112
Lol, yep they go to college and learn about art or music or photography and graduate with higher rates because these subjects are much easier to comprehend and pass. Not to mention they pay less for the same reason, pretty much anyone can do those jobs, without a college degree most of the time. You can't fault an employer for not wanting to pay top dollar for a shitty degree.
Programming
Engineering
Scientific studies
All heavily male dominated fields IN COLLEGE.
why? because women accurately assume they wont be any good at them, because 99% of the time, they won't be.
All degrees are not created equal. A liberal arts major does not have to put the same work in that a doctor (another male dominated field IN COLLEGE) does. infact, it is MUCH MUCH less.
>>672707895
Not always the case and it's still not the case in some places and carrier choices, but get this. Height actually makes more of a difference than sex when it comes to promotions. Shorter people get passed up more often and woman are shorter on average. Calculating that in woman have actually just about closed the gap. We are hard wired to respect larger people. Even if the job doesn't require being tall or strong. Look at the average height of US presidents. On average they range from five foot nine to 6 foot. Being too tall is also a disadvantage. So I should just say being the right height. Being slightly above average. Being too tall equals intimidation which can negatively affect your chances of promotion. So height matters more than sex. In most cases it matters more.than race as well. I'm five foot 9. Five 10 in shoes. So I am not complaining. I'm just pointing out a simple flaw in the feminist arguement. That and that people are stupid and need to subtract their inherent prejudices from their thinking. Overcome your biological wiring and pick the best person for the job. Although b my sis uses her diminutive size to her advantage when interviewing people for the Jews. They say things to her that they might not have said if she wasn't so adorably tiny. Things they shouldn't say.
>>672709112
Name the last time you met a female DOCTOR, not nurse.
>>672708839
Add to that most women can't handle the way men relate to their male friends... if you're really "one of the guys" and not just an interloper, you don't get to complain about playful mockery or being told to shut the fuck up when you say something stupid.
>>672709685
Not the other guy, but I met one last week. She wasn't from the US, Canada, or Europe, though.
>>672708905
"social group thinkers" meaning that they cant act alone without accepting a common thought,
"alphamale" being the leader and coming up with ways not to get the rest of the group killed
>>672709112
Being a doctor takes 8 or so years of schooling, being a nurse takes 2. they are both college degrees, however one profession makes a lot more money than the other one does reguardless of what sex you are, its just that most women aren't willing to put in 8 years and there are plenty of men who will.
>>672709852
oh really!? wow! thats impressive! my point stands.
>>672709781
Ohh, you really hate women, dont you?
>>672710030
What, that feminism and the decadence that we now enjoy is fucking over the Western World while the rest of the world and Russia laugh at us as we spiral down into oblivion?
>>672709852
so a witchdoctor from africa?
>>672709634
>We are hard wired to respect larger people
Maybe at first glance, but once you get to know them, you realize they can be shitty people too. My boss is taller than I, and every time he opens his mouth I want to punch his goddamn face in.
>>672710185
Nah, Russian girl.
>>672709976
Just like most men consider themselves worthy of more than glorified babysitter, so they put in the extra effort and time and money to become a doctor, whereas the females generally become nurses, not always true, but generally speaking, it is 100% accurate.
>>672710183
I agree completely. and yes, exsactly that.
>>672681997
One fat faggot posting the same shitty bait thread all day. Fuck off already
>>672681997
Nice b8
>>672710336
its the same thread you fucknut
>>672710183
^^This
Worst thing is that when they get the awful reception they deserve, they'll blame it on men.
>>672710133
Why would you say that?
>>672710133
>pointing out things women actually do not understand
>you must hate women
kek
>>672710574
yes indeed, i really hope this movie falls flat on its face.
>>672708646
Actually it's because of their height and propensity to take time off to raise children. My sister went freelance, and opned her own newspaper from home in order to keep working while "looking after" her kids. But in all honesty her daughter needs ablittle more supervision. Kids a nightmare. My nephew is ok, but that's because he I.inherited his fathers disposition. His father is a bioengineer with a lot of.patents to his name,and that takes a certain amount of patience and alone time. My niece is hyper active and needs attention. Which she isn't getting, so she acts our constantly. The problem wouldn't exist if the man she married wasn't also always working. Someone has to raise the kids and traditionally that was woman.
>ITT white misogynistic sexist rapists
>>672681997
If she acts like anything other than a stereotypical intelligent scientist then yes... but its probably her own fault for being too dindu and not embracing rational behavior like the rest of the world. I think they try to pass the behavior of being "black" off as culture where thats an insult to actual culture. Its just an excuse to stay lazy, belligerent, and stupid.
